Communism seemed to be haram things that should not be touched. Discussion of the people about communism is considered dangerous. In fact, the circulation of books and literature and even movies about communism was released. No more bans like the new order era. Discusses considered very close to the practice. Reading or watching is considered only to find out and then pout it.

Something is wrong and always wrong on the practice of our state. Something always be swallowed raw, doctrine. Prohibition of discussion as proof that communism is a form of ideological terrorism or state terrorism even if it states a part of these repressive actions.

Historically, communism is an ideology that opposes capitalism presented to the 19th century Europe, which in the end communism, too, who popularized capitalism with extreme opposition. Great figures of Russian named Lenin who became the bearers of the ideological basis in Indonesia practiced by the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) is. “Marxism-Leninism”, that’s the name of Lenin’s thought that others interpret the ideas of Karl Marx.

The purpose of Communism is opposed to capitalism, communism therefore oppose the domination of ownership or where the individual as existing in capitalism. To smooth it, then there must be control, communism and the party who later became mayor of the role of controlling it, it all depends on the party and from here we know the term as a form of totalitarianism is more stringent than authoritarianism. Countries through which the party holds regulate people’s overall life.

Impression or our knowledge is always limited or led to the bad side of communism is the destruction even prakrek violence committed by followers first. Massacres in Russia (read: the Soviet Union) or even performed here indicated by the Party of Indonesia Komunias the reason why we should hate or outraged communism. As for the positive side, not much composed. About how communism in many ways get rid of capitalism. About how communism put the interests of workers and peasants, as well as initiated by Mao Zedong in China.

Limited knowledge of the various sides of communism was suspected by the limitations of literature or even access to the existing literature. Besides the more influential is the study of space limitations of this understanding, and these limitations caused by the indiscriminate defamation against communism. Dissolution, threats or violence as practiced today for the participants to act is not necessarily intelligent in the effort to make a nation.

The distribution and sale of books about communism is not merely an attempt pencerdasan but more directed to attempt to make communism as a commodity trading mengggiurkan. Let us look at just the titles or book covers a good supply of communism, fascism or ideologies on the left stamp. Not rare to find a title and cover that indignation or even dramatized have a standard content and contains only reviews the history and not complete.

Discussion, is a process that will test our knowledge and also to cure ignorance. Break that the discussion would also make us not receive anything in the raw. We are required to digest and assess the process of thinking that we do in the discussion. By law, the discussion is a basic human rights or human rights. Therefore, those who oppose a discussion, whatever the subject of discussion, is violating human rights and the proper tersebutlah more than communism dinistakan though, because they significantly inhibit pencerdasan society. And educate the people is the goal of the republic.

The question to me personally, whether the opposition to communism, our nation has to understand the system or ideology of the current state, if democracy has been studied, whether the Pancasila also been obliged, or lest we never discussed it? Then, until when we take refuge behind the nation’s own ignorance?

Deni Andriana

Komentar via Facebook